[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [git pull] device-mapper patches for 2.6.29
- From: Stefan Richter <stefanr s5r6 in-berlin de>
- To: "Cheng Renquan (程任全)" <crquan gmail com>
- Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, Andi Kleen <ak suse de>, dm-devel redhat com, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>, Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura ce jp nec com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [git pull] device-mapper patches for 2.6.29
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:59:40 +0100
Cheng Renquan (程任全) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:15:58AM +0800, Cheng Renquan (程任全) wrote:
>>> So now maybe we can add a null macro to module_refcount if
>>> CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD undefined?
>>
>> Do we even need the test at all?
>
> So you mean add "#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD ..." to dm-target.c? I
> can do that, but I really don't know a better solution without
> conditional compiling?
The fact that module_refcount may be undefined is an indicator that this
is not an API for general use.
Why are you wanting to peek into the reference count of a module?
Shouldn't you have everything covered by properly recounting all your
data objects? (Preferably via the kref API.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]