Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
Hi Alasdair, On 01/29/2009 12:37 AM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:50:38AM -0400, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:Could we have separate Kconfig options to select them?The following patches add the following 2 dynamic load balancers to request-based dm-multipath: o queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-queue-length. o service-time oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-service-time.Sure. I posted the new one rebased on top of 2.6.29-rc2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00183.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00186.html
For the Kconfig help, is there something we could add to help people know when to choose one or the other? Sort of like how the block layer io scheduler (block/Kconfig.iosched) says one might be helpful for desktops and one is useful for data bses?