[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/0] dm-mpath: queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer
- From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>
- To: Alasdair Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com, stefan bader canonical com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/0] dm-mpath: queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:10:38 +0900
Hi Alasdair,
Sorry for confusing you.
On 01/29/2009 11:03 PM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:59:10PM +0900, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
>> This patch-set can be applied on top of 2.6.29-rc2.
>
> It's not clear: are you reordering the dependencies now?
>
> Previously there were three sets of patches taken in this order:
> 1 change to request-based
> 2 add queue length ps
> 3 add service time ps
> i.e. 2 and 3 depend on 1
>
> Are you now changing that so that 2 and 3 could go upstream before 1?
I had sent those three sets in the order above since 1 enhances 2 and 3.
But 2 and 3 don't functionally depend on 1 (although 1 and 3 have
a few cosmetic dependencies), so we can reorder that as we want.
2 and 3 are simpler patches than 1, and I found some problems in 1,
so I think reordering might be a good idea if you are OK.
As for 3, I still want to get feedback from others as it'll involve
discussion about the optimal interface for load balancer.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]