[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31] block: add request clone interface (v2)
- From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh panasas com>
- To: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>
- Cc: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura ce jp nec com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31] block: add request clone interface (v2)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:02:49 +0300
On 06/16/2009 06:02 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hi Boaz, Jeff, Jens,
>>> Perhaps
>>> blk_rq_{clone,declone} or blk_rq_{clone,declone}_bios
>>>
>>> (Both unclone and declone are found on the net but are not
>>> found in the free dictionary)
>
> I had a feeling that blk_rq_{clone,declone} allocates/frees
> the clone request inside the interfaces like bio_clone(), so
> I didn't take such namings.
> And, the clone setup interface may not only make bio clones
> but also do something else (for other request members), so
> I didn't add any 'bio' namings to the interfaces.
>
I'm convinced blk_rq_prep_clone is good for what it actually does
> Jens, what do you prefer?
>
> Thanks,
> Kiyoshi Ueda
Thanks
Boaz
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]