[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 02/19] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer
- From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- To: Divyesh Shah <dpshah google com>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, snitzer redhat com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, jens axboe oracle com, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, guijianfeng cn fujitsu com, fernando oss ntt co jp, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, akpm linux-foundation org, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, s-uchida ap jp nec com, righi andrea gmail com, jbaron redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 02/19] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:59:32 -0400
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:44:58PM -0700, Divyesh Shah wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Vivek Goyal<vgoyal redhat com> wrote:
> > void elv_deactivate_ioq(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct io_queue *ioq,
> > + int requeue)
> > +{
> > + if (ioq == efqd->active_queue)
> > + elv_reset_active_ioq(efqd);
> > +
> > + bfq_deactivate_entity(&ioq->entity, requeue);
> > +}
>
> The check for ioq == efqd->active_queue and the call to
> elv_reset_active_ioq() seem to be unnecessary. This gets called from
> elv_del_ioq_busy() which has 2 callers which:
> - either explicitly check for ioq != efqd->active_queue
> - or call elv_reset_active_ioq() right before invoking this function
>
> This was needed earlier as the io_ioq_move() function didn't fall in
> one of the 2 categories above. This has been done away with the ref
> counting patch, AFAICT.
True. Looks like we don't need above reset_active_ioq() call in
deactivate_ioq(). I will get rid of it in next posting. Thanks.
Vivek
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]