[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 18/19] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling
- From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng cn fujitsu com>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, snitzer redhat com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, jens axboe oracle com, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, fernando oss ntt co jp, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, akpm linux-foundation org, jbaron redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, s-uchida ap jp nec com, righi andrea gmail com, containers lists linux-foundation org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 18/19] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:05:26 -0400
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:40:38AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[..]
> > + * An entity has been freshly added to active tree. Either it came from
> > + * idle tree or it was not on any of the trees. Do the accounting.
> > + */
> > +static inline void bfq_account_for_entity_addition(struct io_entity *entity)
> > +{
> > + struct io_group *iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
> > +
> > + if (iog) {
> > + struct elv_fq_data *efqd;
> > + char path[128];
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Keep track of how many times a group has been removed
> > + * from active tree because it did not have any active
> > + * backlogged ioq under it
> > + */
>
> Hi Vivek,
>
> Should the comment here be "added to" rather than "removed from"?
Yes, it is copy paste error. Fixed for next posting.
Thanks
Vivek
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]