[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5)
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir linux vnet ibm com>
- To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, snitzer redhat com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, jens axboe oracle com, agk redhat com, paolo valente unimore it, guijianfeng cn fujitsu com, fernando oss ntt co jp, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, akpm linux-foundation org, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, s-uchida ap jp nec com, righi andrea gmail com, jbaron redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5)
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:51:16 +0530
* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com> [2009-06-19 16:37:18]:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here is the V5 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30.
[snip]
> Testing
> =======
>
[snip]
I've not been reading through the discussions in complete detail, but
I see no reference to async reads or aio. In the case of aio, aio
presumes the context of the user space process. Could you elaborate on
any testing you've done with these cases?
--
Balbir
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]