[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] REQUEST for new 'topology' metrics to be moved out of the 'queue' sysfs directory.
- From: "NeilBrown" <neilb suse de>
- To: "Jens Axboe" <jens axboe oracle com>
- Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-raid vger kernel org, linux-ide vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, linux-scsi vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] REQUEST for new 'topology' metrics to be moved out of the 'queue' sysfs directory.
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:23:17 +1000 (EST)
On Fri, June 26, 2009 10:50 pm, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
>> Every block device has a 'gendisk' (aka generic disk).
>> Every block device also (currently) has a request_queue.
>
> I don't know why you keep saying currently. It has always had a queue,
> and I don't see a good reason why that should change for "special" block
> devices like md/dm/loop/whatnot.
I say "currently" because I'm planning to create patches to make it
optional, and I want to get you used to the idea :-)
And md/dm/loop/whatnot are not "special" block devices, any more than
scsi/ide are "special" block devices. They are all just block devices.
They use different mechanisms, but each is just as valid as the other.
The current code makes 'struct request' based block devices in to
first-class citizens, and all the rest are second class (having to
tag our data structures on ->queue data and/or ->private_data).
I just want all block devices to be equal.
NeilBrown
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]