[dm-devel] [PATCH multipath-tools-0.4.7.rhel5.13 1/1] multipathd excessive path checker logging

Chandra Seetharaman sekharan at us.ibm.com
Fri Jun 26 23:54:26 UTC 2009


I agree with Ben. 

Reducing it to every 10th pass for down would be a good compromise.

On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 15:50 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:50:51PM -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
> >
> > multipathd logs a path checker message whenever state changes. But it also 
> > logs every non-changed message when verbosity is >=4 and newstate is 
> > PATH_UP or PATH_GHOST, and every non-changed message when verbosity is >= 2 
> > and newstate is PATH_DOWN.
> >
> > I believe that the message should only be logged, once, when state changes.
> 
> I disagree.  If you look at the stuff that gets logged when verbosity >=
> 4, you'll see that it's a whole bunch of stuff that normal users would
> never care about, but may be useful for debugging.  This clearly fits.
> 
> I also think that having a path down is something that shouldn't just
> blip by once in the logs.  It's something that often requires the
> sysadmin to intervene. I could see limitting it to, say, only happen
> on every tenth pass through the checker loop, so that these messages
> don't clog up the logs so bad. But since there is the option to set the
> verbosity to 1 to avoid this, I think that printing the path down
> messages repeatedly is useful.
> 
> -Ben
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Brady <charlieb at budge.apana.org.au>
> >
> > --- multipath-tools-0.4.7.rhel5.13/multipathd/main.c	2009-06-25 13:32:57.248455000 -0400
> > +++ mezzanine_patched_multipath-tools-0.4.7.rhel5.13/multipathd/main.c	2009-06-25 13:32:12.968639000 -0400
> > @@ -1041,7 +1041,6 @@
> >  					enable_group(pp);
> >  			}
> >  			else if (newstate == PATH_UP || newstate == PATH_GHOST) {
> > -				LOG_MSG(4, checker_message(&pp->checker));
> >  				/*
> >  				 * double the next check delay.
> >  				 * max at conf->max_checkint
> > @@ -1055,8 +1054,6 @@
> >  				condlog(4, "%s: delay next check %is",
> >  						pp->dev_t, pp->tick);
> >  			}
> > -			else if (newstate == PATH_DOWN)
> > -				LOG_MSG(2, checker_message(&pp->checker));
> >
> >  			pp->state = newstate;
> >
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




More information about the dm-devel mailing list