[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 14/14] barriers
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>
- To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 14/14] barriers
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:23:00PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE doesn't work and I doubt that it can be made work with
> > barriers.
>
> Didn't we discuss this before?
> We *require* DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE functionality - I can't apply a patch that
> breaks it. But it is not something that can be used arbitrarily - it is
> only used in situations where core dm is firmly in control (and I/O cannot get
> through to the device e.g. all paths down in multipath) and I don't see why it
> can't continue to work with barriers.
>
> I hope it's just the comment that is wrong here - or does the patch need
> updating?
Oh, sorry, that is old comment for the old version of that patch. I fixed
the code but forgot to remove the comment. The code in the patch should be
correct w.r.t. DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE.
Mikulas
> Alasdair
> --
> agk redhat com
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]