[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
- From: Dan Williams <dan j williams gmail com>
- To: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff garzik org>, linux-scsi vger kernel org, heinzm redhat com, Mauelshagen redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-ide vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, jens axboe oracle com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:23:46 -0700
[ added heinzm redhat com ]
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org> wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org> wrote:
>>> Pushing this in the kernel without updating dm-raid is kind of
>>> pointless. Who should I be poking to get the userland part moving?
>>
>> Dmraid is not the only potential user. Mdadm will also care about
>> this as I have seen a report that points to a user having what looks
>> like an HPA issue with an Intel(R) Matrix array. So, there are two
>> immediate users for this interface. Heinz is the right person to poke
>> for dmraid updates. I'll handle the mdadm update.
>
> Alright, then. With Jeff's reluctant ack and scheduled mdadm update,
> I guess this one can go upstream. I'll refresh the patchset and
> repost. Umm... BTW do I have Heinz's mail address right?
Heinz, here is the whole thread:
http://marc.info/?t=123345711600004&r=1&w=2
- References:
- [dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
- [dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
- [dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
- [dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
- [dm-devel] Re: [PATCHSET] block,scsi,libata: implement alt_size
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]