[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add scsi_device->alt_capacity
- From: James Bottomley <James Bottomley HansenPartnership com>
- To: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Cc: jeff garzik org, linux-scsi vger kernel org, jens axboe oracle com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-ide vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, Mauelshagen redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add scsi_device->alt_capacity
- Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 16:23:43 +0000
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 01:09 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > This is done at slightly the wrong level. Capacity is actually a
> > property of struct scsi_disk not struct scsi_device ... shouldn't
> > alt_capacity be at the same level?
>
> Hmmm... I think that was my first try and then I moved it to sdev for
> some reason I can't rememer now. I'll look into it again and try to
> move it into sdev.
Really one of the things I was wondering is why even scsi_disk ...
capacity is in there, but it's also in gendisk, so I've thought
(admittedly never translated it to action) that we could just remove the
duplication in scsi_disk.
This alt_capacity looks to be a pure ATA thing ... I can't find it in
the SCSI specs and there doesn't seem to be a SAT equivalent of the
commands. Ideally, what should be happening is that the ata ULD would
issue the capacity commands and just set the block alt_capacity without
having to worry about transporting the value up and down the stack.
Matthew Wilcox thought we could begin an implementation of the ATA uld
using the ATA_16 command to transport it through SCSI ... this might
provide the good reason to begin that.
James
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]