[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] dm: Add deleting check to target_message
- From: malahal us ibm com
- To: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] dm: Add deleting check to target_message
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:32:43 -0800
Mike Anderson [andmike linux vnet ibm com] wrote:
> Add dm_table_md_deleting check to target_message
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Anderson <andmike linux vnet ibm com>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
> index a679429..04e252c 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
> @@ -1292,6 +1292,11 @@ static int target_message(struct dm_ioctl *param, size_t param_size)
> if (!table)
> goto out_argv;
>
> + if (dm_table_md_deleting(table)) {
> + r = -ENXIO;
> + goto out_table;
> + }
Is there some reason that DELETING bit won't be set while executing the
rest of the following code. If not, what is the point of checking the
bit above?
>
> ti = dm_table_find_target(table, tmsg->sector);
> if (!dm_target_is_valid(ti)) {
> DMWARN("Target message sector outside device.");
> @@ -1303,6 +1308,7 @@ static int target_message(struct dm_ioctl *param, size_t param_size)
> r = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + out_table:
> dm_table_put(table);
> out_argv:
> kfree(argv);
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]