[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add suspended check to multipath_message
- From: malahal us ibm com
- To: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add suspended check to multipath_message
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:35:27 -0800
Mike Anderson [andmike linux vnet ibm com] wrote:
> Add suspended check to multipath_message
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Anderson <andmike linux vnet ibm com>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> index 32d0b87..ee56ef7 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> @@ -1402,6 +1402,9 @@ static int multipath_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> struct multipath *m = (struct multipath *) ti->private;
> action_fn action;
>
> + if (dm_table_md_suspended(ti->table))
> + return -EBUSY;
Same question as DELETING. SUSPEND bit could be set just after the above
check. Is it OK if the following code executes after the SUSPEND bit is
set???
> +
> if (argc == 1) {
> if (!strnicmp(argv[0], MESG_STR("queue_if_no_path")))
> return queue_if_no_path(m, 1, 0);
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]