[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo elte hu>
- To: Mike Galbraith <efault gmx de>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, jmarchan redhat com, fernando oss ntt co jp, Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr 13a datenparkplatz de>, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, riel redhat com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, righi andrea gmail com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10
- Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:20:21 +0200
* Mike Galbraith <efault gmx de> wrote:
> unsigned int cfq_desktop;
> + unsigned int cfq_desktop_dispatch;
> - if (cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq) && cfqd->rq_in_driver[BLK_RW_ASYNC])
> + if (cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq) && cfqd->rq_in_driver[BLK_RW_ASYNC]) {
> + cfqd->desktop_dispatch_ts = jiffies;
> return 0;
> + }
btw., i hope all those desktop_ things will be named latency_ pretty
soon as the consensus seems to be - the word 'desktop' feels so wrong in
this context.
'desktop' is a form of use of computers and the implication of good
latencies goes far beyond that category of systems.
Ingo
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]