[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault gmx de>
- To: Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, jmarchan redhat com, fernando oss ntt co jp, Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr 13a datenparkplatz de>, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, Ingo Molnar <mingo elte hu>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, riel redhat com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, righi andrea gmail com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:15:27 +0200
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 22:17 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 20:38 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 04 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 19:39 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > So I'll commit a change that doesn't do the delay at all, basically it
> > > > > just offset the current code by one slice.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, when it hits block-for-linus, I'll take it out for a spin.
> > >
> > > It's committed:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=e00c54c36ac2024c3a8a37432e2e2698ff849594
> >
> > Looks like a keeper to me :)
>
> Wonderful, so I take it this passes your 'gut feel' test too? :-)
Heh, yeah. Box feels good, disk sounds happy.. none of those little
indescribables that make you suddenly go alert.
-Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]