[dm-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] LVM: Split mirror capability
Jonathan Brassow
jbrassow at redhat.com
Tue Oct 13 21:20:42 UTC 2009
Adding code to allow users to split legs off of a mirror wasn't all that
hard. However, I could use some help regarding the nature of the
arguments that should be used to invoke this action.
The following patches introduce a new (horrible) argument '--split' to
lvconvert that signals the intent to split and keep a desired leg of a
mirror. Example run:
[root at bp-01 ~]# lvcreate -m2 -L 500M -n lv vg
Logical volume "lv" created
[root at bp-01 ~]# lvs -a -o name,copy_percent,devices
LV Copy% Devices
LogVol00 /dev/sda2(0)
LogVol01 /dev/sda2(4451)
lv 100.00 lv_mimage_0(0),lv_mimage_1(0),lv_mimage_2(0)
[lv_mimage_0] /dev/sdb1(0)
[lv_mimage_1] /dev/sdc1(0)
[lv_mimage_2] /dev/sdd1(0)
[lv_mlog] /dev/sdi1(0)
[root at bp-01 ~]# lvconvert -m1 --split vg/lv /dev/sdc1
Logical volume lv converted.
[root at bp-01 ~]# lvs
LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert
LogVol00 VolGroup00 -wi-ao 139.09g
LogVol01 VolGroup00 -wi-ao 9.81g
lv vg mwi-a- 500.00m lv_mlog 100.00
lv_mimage_1 vg -wi-a- 500.00m
You can see from the above that I went as far as to specify the leg I
wanted split off.
Aside from the new '--split' argument not being very good, we also end
up with a new logical volume named, 'lv_mimage_1', which also isn't very
good. Should I change the name via s/_mimage_1/-copy-%d/, or should I
allow the name to be specified (or left alone)?
Here is the current syntax and some others I have thought of:
# New '--split' argument.
# This is suppose to give the user the ability to signify a split
# of the mirror, rather than a reduction/increase in mirror images.
# However, something like '--keep_images' might better signify that
# although we are reducing the number of mirror legs, we want to
# have them presented rather than removed.
prompt> lvconvert -m <n> --split vg/lv <removable device(s)>
# New '--splitmirror <n>' argument
# Replaces '-m <n> --split', and rather than specifying the number
# of legs you want remaining in the mirror when finished, you specify
# the number of legs you want split off.
#
# BTW, you can only split off one leg at a time right now, but I
# don't see a reason why we couldn't split a 4-way mirror into
# 2 2-way mirrors at some point in the future. (Being able to
# specify the removable devices also allows us to choose every
# other device if we chose to.)
prompt> lvconvert --splitmirror 1 vg/lv <removable device(s)>
Please added better ideas if you have them... I am leaning toward the
second example (even though I implemented the 1st in the patches).
Concerning the naming of the newly split off device, we could use the
'-n <name>' argument. If unspecified, we would have to choose some
default.
brassow
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list