[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 18/23] io-controller: blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios.
- From: Rik van Riel <riel redhat com>
- To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, jens axboe oracle com, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, jmarchan redhat com, guijianfeng cn fujitsu com, fernando oss ntt co jp, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, mingo elte hu, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, s-uchida ap jp nec com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, righi andrea gmail com, torvalds linux-foundation org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 18/23] io-controller: blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios.
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:53:42 -0400
Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 04:00:04PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
I think that swap writeouts should be charged to the memory hogging
process, because the process consumes more resources and it should get
a penalty.
A process requesting memory gets IO penalty?
There is no easy answer here.
On the one hand, you want to charge the process that uses
the resources.
On the other hand, if a lower resource use / higher priority
process tries to free up some of those resources, it should
not have its IO requests penalized (and get slowed down)
because of something the first process did...
--
All rights reversed.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]