[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests
- From: Rik van Riel <riel redhat com>
- To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov valinux co jp>
- Cc: guijianfeng cn fujitsu com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, jmoyer redhat com, dm-devel redhat com, vgoyal redhat com, jens axboe oracle com, nauman google com, akpm linux-foundation org, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:53:41 -0400
Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
However, if you want to get fairness in a case like this, a new
bandwidth control policy which controls accurately according to
assigned weights can be added to dm-ioband.
Are you saying that dm-ioband is purposely unfair,
until a certain load level is reached?
We regarded reducing throughput loss rather than reducing duration
as the design of dm-ioband. Of course, it is possible to make a new
policy which reduces duration.
... while also reducing overall system throughput
by design?
Why are you even bothering to submit this to the
linux-kernel mailing list, when there is a codebase
available that has no throughput or fairness regressions?
(Vivek's io scheduler based io controler)
--
All rights reversed.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]