[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir linux vnet ibm com>
- To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov valinux co jp>
- Cc: riel redhat com, guijianfeng cn fujitsu com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, jmoyer redhat com, dm-devel redhat com, vgoyal redhat com, jens axboe oracle com, nauman google com, akpm linux-foundation org, agk redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:52:55 +0530
* Ryo Tsuruta <ryov valinux co jp> [2009-09-08 12:01:19]:
> I think there are some advantages to dm-ioband. That's why I post
> dm-ioband to the mailing list.
>
> - dm-ioband supports not only proportional weight policy but also rate
> limiting policy. Besides, new policies can be added to dm-ioband if
> a user wants to control bandwidth by his or her own policy.
> - The dm-ioband driver can be replaced without stopping the system by
> using device-mapper's facility. It's easy to maintain.
> - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an
> advantage.)
But don't you need page_cgroup for IO tracking?
--
Balbir
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]