[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V9
- From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng cn fujitsu com>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, jens axboe oracle com, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, jmarchan redhat com, fernando oss ntt co jp, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, mingo elte hu, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, riel redhat com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, s-uchida ap jp nec com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, righi andrea gmail com, torvalds linux-foundation org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V9
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 09:55:36 -0400
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:14:06AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> Here is the vanilla kernel and V9 comparision.
>
> Normal Read | Random Read | Normal Write | Random Write
>
> vanilla(Avg of 3 times) 67580 KiB/s 3540 KiB/s 61964 KiB/s 9823 KiB/s
>
> V9(Avg of 3 times) 68954 KiB/s 3567 KiB/s 60654 KiB/s 9858 KiB/s
>
> Performance +2.0% +0.7% -2.1% +0.3%
>
Thanks Gui. So that's lot of improvements from previous versions. I remember
you were noticing 7% regressions in buffered write performance.
Thanks
Vivek
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]