[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10
- From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- To: Mike Galbraith <efault gmx de>
- Cc: dhaval linux vnet ibm com, peterz infradead org, dm-devel redhat com, dpshah google com, Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>, agk redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com, paolo valente unimore it, jmarchan redhat com, fernando oss ntt co jp, Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr 13a datenparkplatz de>, mikew google com, jmoyer redhat com, nauman google com, mingo elte hu, m-ikeda ds jp nec com, riel redhat com, lizf cn fujitsu com, fchecconi gmail com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, righi andrea gmail com, torvalds linux-foundation org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:24:47 -0400
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:05:39PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>
> > /*
> > + * We may have seeky queues, don't throttle up just yet.
> > + */
> > + if (time_before(jiffies, cfqd->last_seeker + CIC_SEEK_THR))
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> bzzzt. Window too large, but the though is to let them overload, but
> not instantly.
>
CIC_SEEK_THR is 8K jiffies so that would be 8seconds on 1000HZ system. Try
using one "slice_idle" period of 8 ms. But it might turn out to be too
short depending on the disk speed.
Thanks
Vivek
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]