[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [BUG] multipath-tools: uuid has become meaningless
- From: Malahal Naineni <malahal us ibm com>
- To: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [BUG] multipath-tools: uuid has become meaningless
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:56:34 -0700
Christophe Varoqui [christophe varoqui gmail com] wrote:
> >
> > My thoughts on fixing this:
> > 1. Technically nothing wrong. Live with it and make sure that device
> > mapper's uuid are meaningless for user and fix 'multipath -l' to
> > not print uuid's.
>
> I don't like this one : the uuid is the communication medium with storage
> teams in big IT departement.
>
> > 2. Don't support user_friendly_names in initrd. Could be just documented
> > or an option to multipath is added to ignore that feature and that
> > option is used in initrd calls!
>
> I let distributors comment on this one, but I guess it will replace a
> confusion (a naming file in initrd the sysadmin have to keep in sync) by
> another (root kparm not consistent with what you see on a booted system).
> I personnaly agree that user_friendly_names disabled in initrd would be a
> safer confuser.
>
> > 3. We could rename the devices instead of reload -- really fixing this!
> >
>
> This one seems safe.
Sorry for the delay. I actually found another easier way to fix it!
Looks like the bindings file in initramfs and the active root file
system may not be in *sync* but not *inconsistent*. The problem happens
because the initramfs is mounted read/write, and multipath modifies
bindings file in memory at initramfs time that may become *inconsistent*
with the bindings file in the active root file system.
The patch in a next mail will add an option to 'multipath' to not update
the bindings file. It will treat it as read-only, so devices that don't
have an entry in the bindings file will get WWID based names.
Thanks, Malahal.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]