[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Performance impact of CONFIG_SCHED_MC? direct-io test case
- From: Dominik Brodowski <linux dominikbrodowski net>
- To: linux-kernel vger kernel org, mingo redhat com, peterz infradead org
- Cc: Michael Monnerie <michael monnerie is it-management at>, linux-raid vger kernel org, Valdis Kletnieks vt edu, xfs oss sgi com, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, dm-devel redhat com, Chris Mason <chris mason oracle com>, josef redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Performance impact of CONFIG_SCHED_MC? direct-io test case
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:54:48 +0200
How large is the performance impact of CONFIG_SCHED_MC -- for which there
is a warning that it comes "at a cost of slightly increased overhead in
some places."? Well, for the test workload I've been working with lately,
dd if=<device> of=/dev/zero bs=8k count=100000 iflag=direct
where <device> is a dm-crypted LVM volume consisting of several
partitions on a notebook pata harddisk, and all this runs on a Core2 Duo,
I get a ~ 10 % performance reduction if CONFIG_SCHED_MC is enabled.
Combined with the CONFIG_DEBUG performance reduction mentioned in the other
message, all of the reduction from 28 MB/s to 18 MB/s is explained for.
Best,
Dominik
PS: Ingo: you got both mingo elte hu and mingo redhat com in MAINTAINERS,
I suppose both are valid?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]