[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] [PATCH 16/30] lguest: replace VIRTIO_F_BARRIER support with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH support
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: jaxboe fusionio com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, linux-scsi vger kernel org, linux-ide vger kernel org, linux-raid vger kernel org, hch lst de, James Bottomley suse de, tytso mit edu, chris mason oracle com, swhiteho redhat com, konishi ryusuke lab ntt co jp, dm-devel redhat com, vst vlnb net, jack suse cz, rwheeler redhat com, hare suse de, neilb suse de, rusty rustcorp com au, mst redhat com, jeremy goop org, snitzer redhat com, k-ueda ct jp nec com
- Cc: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH 16/30] lguest: replace VIRTIO_F_BARRIER support with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH support
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:47:33 +0200
VIRTIO_F_BARRIER is deprecated. Replace it with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH
support.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty rustcorp com au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>
---
Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
index e9ce3c5..fbc64b3 100644
--- a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
+++ b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
@@ -1639,15 +1639,6 @@ static void blk_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
off = out->sector * 512;
/*
- * The block device implements "barriers", where the Guest indicates
- * that it wants all previous writes to occur before this write. We
- * don't have a way of asking our kernel to do a barrier, so we just
- * synchronize all the data in the file. Pretty poor, no?
- */
- if (out->type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER)
- fdatasync(vblk->fd);
-
- /*
* In general the virtio block driver is allowed to try SCSI commands.
* It'd be nice if we supported eject, for example, but we don't.
*/
@@ -1679,6 +1670,13 @@ static void blk_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
/* Die, bad Guest, die. */
errx(1, "Write past end %llu+%u", off, ret);
}
+
+ wlen = sizeof(*in);
+ *in = (ret >= 0 ? VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK : VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
+ } else if (out->type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH) {
+ /* Flush */
+ ret = fdatasync(vblk->fd);
+ verbose("FLUSH fdatasync: %i\n", ret);
wlen = sizeof(*in);
*in = (ret >= 0 ? VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK : VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
} else {
@@ -1702,15 +1700,6 @@ static void blk_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
}
}
- /*
- * OK, so we noted that it was pretty poor to use an fdatasync as a
- * barrier. But Christoph Hellwig points out that we need a sync
- * *afterwards* as well: "Barriers specify no reordering to the front
- * or the back." And Jens Axboe confirmed it, so here we are:
- */
- if (out->type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER)
- fdatasync(vblk->fd);
-
/* Finished that request. */
add_used(vq, head, wlen);
}
@@ -1735,8 +1724,8 @@ static void setup_block_file(const char *filename)
vblk->fd = open_or_die(filename, O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE);
vblk->len = lseek64(vblk->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
- /* We support barriers. */
- add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BARRIER);
+ /* We support FLUSH. */
+ add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH);
/* Tell Guest how many sectors this device has. */
conf.capacity = cpu_to_le64(vblk->len / 512);
--
1.7.1
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]