[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
- From: Jan Kara <jack suse cz>
- To: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Cc: jeremy goop org, jack suse cz, snitzer redhat com, mst redhat com, linux-ide vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de, konishi ryusuke lab ntt co jp, Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>, k-ueda ct jp nec com, vst vlnb net, linux-scsi vger kernel org, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, rusty rustcorp com au, linux-raid vger kernel org, swhiteho redhat com, chris mason oracle com, tytso mit edu, jaxboe fusionio com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, rwheeler redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:02:24 +0200
On Wed 25-08-10 17:57:41, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 08/25/2010 06:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
> >>>
> >>> ext4 already uses synchronous discards, no need to add I/O barriers.
> >>
> >> This needs the patch that Jan sent in reply to my initial version merged
> >> into it.
> >
> > Actually the jbd2 patch needs it merged, but the point still stands.
>
> Yeah, wasn't sure about that one. Has anyone tested it? I'll be
> happy to merge it but I have no idea whether it's correct or not and
> Jan didn't seem to have tested it so... Jan, shall I merge the patch?
I'm quite confident the patch is correct so you can merge it I think but
tomorrow I'll give it some crash testing together with the rest of your
patch set in KVM to be sure.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack suse cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]