[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: Jan Kara <jack suse cz>
- Cc: jeremy goop org, snitzer redhat com, mst redhat com, linux-ide vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de, konishi ryusuke lab ntt co jp, Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>, k-ueda ct jp nec com, vst vlnb net, linux-scsi vger kernel org, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, rusty rustcorp com au, linux-raid vger kernel org, swhiteho redhat com, chris mason oracle com, tytso mit edu, jaxboe fusionio com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, rwheeler redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:25:47 +0200
On 08/25/2010 10:02 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 25-08-10 17:57:41, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On 08/25/2010 06:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4 already uses synchronous discards, no need to add I/O barriers.
>>>>
>>>> This needs the patch that Jan sent in reply to my initial version merged
>>>> into it.
>>>
>>> Actually the jbd2 patch needs it merged, but the point still stands.
>>
>> Yeah, wasn't sure about that one. Has anyone tested it? I'll be
>> happy to merge it but I have no idea whether it's correct or not and
>> Jan didn't seem to have tested it so... Jan, shall I merge the patch?
> I'm quite confident the patch is correct so you can merge it I think but
> tomorrow I'll give it some crash testing together with the rest of your
> patch set in KVM to be sure.
Patch included in the series before jbd2 conversion patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]