[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
- From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh panasas com>
- To: Jan Kara <jack suse cz>
- Cc: jeremy goop org, snitzer redhat com, mst redhat com, linux-ide vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de, konishi ryusuke lab ntt co jp, Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>, k-ueda ct jp nec com, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst vlnb net>, linux-scsi vger kernel org, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer redhat com>, rusty rustcorp com au, linux-raid vger kernel org, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>, swhiteho redhat com, chris mason oracle com, tytso mit edu, jaxboe fusionio com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, rwheeler redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:55:23 +0300
On 08/31/2010 12:02 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 31-08-10 00:39:41, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>> Jan Kara, on 08/31/2010 12:20 AM wrote:
>>> On Mon 30-08-10 15:56:43, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>>> Jan Kara<jack suse cz> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> An update: I've set up an ext4 barrier testing in KVM - run fsstress,
>>>>> kill KVM at some random moment and check that the filesystem is consistent
>>>>> (kvm is run in cache=writeback mode to simulate disk cache). About 70 runs
>>>>
>>>> But doesn't your "disk cache" survive the "power cycle" of your guest?
>>> Yes, you're right. Thinking about it now the test setup was wrong because
>>> it didn't refuse writes to the VM's data partition after the moment I
>>> killed KVM. Thanks for catching this. I will probably have to use the fault
>>> injection on the host to disallow writing the device at a certain moment.
>>> Or does somebody have a better option?
>>
>> Have you considered to setup a second box as an iSCSI target (e.g.
>> with iSCSI-SCST)? With it killing the connectivity is just a matter
>> of a single iptables command + a lot more options.
Still same problem no? the data is still cached on the backing store device
how do you trash the cached data?
> Hmm, this might be an interesting option. Will try that. Thanks for
> suggestion.
>
> Honza
with stgt it's very simple as well. It's a user mode application.
All on the same machine:
- run stgt application
- login + mount a filesystem
- run test
- kill -9 stgt mid flight
But how to throw away the data on the backing store cache?
Boaz
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]