[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: Jon Nelson <jnelson jamponi net>
- Cc: htejun gmail com, Matt <jackdachef gmail com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel vger kernel org>, dm-devel <dm-devel redhat com>, Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>, Chris Mason <chris mason oracle com>, htd <htd fancy-poultry org>, linux-ext4 vger kernel org, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs vger kernel org>, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:22:43 -0500
On Tue, Dec 07 2010 at 1:10pm -0500,
Jon Nelson <jnelson jamponi net> wrote:
> I finally found some time to test this out. With 2.6.37-rc4 (openSUSE
> KOTD kernel) I easily encounter the issue.
>
> Using a virtual machine, I created a stock, minimal openSUSE 11.3 x86_64
> install, installed all updates, installed postgresql and the 'KOTD'
> (Kernel of the Day)
> kernel, and ran the following tests (as postgres user because I'm
> lazy).
>
> 1. create a database (from bash):
>
> createdb test
>
> 2. place the following contents in a file (I used 't.sql'):
>
> begin;
> create temporary table foo as select x as a, ARRAY[x] as b FROM
> generate_series(1, 10000000 ) AS x;
> create index foo_a_idx on foo (a);
> create index foo_b_idx on foo USING GIN (b);
> rollback;
>
> 3. execute that sql:
>
> psql -f t.sql --echo-all test
>
>
> With 2.6.34.7 I can re-run [3] all day long, as many times as I want,
> without issue.
>
> With 2.6.37-rc4-13 (the currently-installed KOTD kernel) if tails
> pretty frequently.
How does it fail? postgres errors? kernel errors?
> Then I tested with the 'vanilla' kernel available here:
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/vanilla/standard/
>
> The 'vanilla' kernel exhibited the same problems.
> The version I tested: 2.6.37-rc4-219-g771f8bc-vanilla.
>
> Incidentally, quick tests of jfs, xfs, and ext3 do _not_ show the same
> problems, although I will note that I usually saw failure at least 1
> in 3, but sometimes had to re-run the sql test 4 or 5 times before I
> saw failure.
>
> I will continue to do some testing, but I will hold off on testing the
> commits above until I receive further testing suggestions.
OK, so to be clear: your testing is on dm-crypt + ext4?
And you're testing upstream based kernels (meaning the dm-crypt
scalability patch that has been in question is _not_ in the mix)?
That is a very different report than the other 2 reports of corruption
(those corruption instances were only seen once the dm-crypt scalability
patch was introduced).
Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]