[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
- From: Matt <jackdachef gmail com>
- To: Chris Mason <chris mason oracle com>
- Cc: Jon Nelson <jnelson jamponi net>, htejun <htejun gmail com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso mit edu>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel vger kernel org>, dm-devel <dm-devel redhat com>, Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>, htd <htd fancy-poultry org>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4 vger kernel org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs vger kernel org>, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:53:30 +0100
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Chris Mason <chris mason oracle com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2010-12-09 18:16:16 -0500:
>> > 512MB.
>> >
>> > 'free' reports 75MB, 419MB free.
>> >
>> > I originally noticed the problem on really real hardware (thinkpad
>> > T61p), however.
>>
>> If you can easily reproduce it could you try a git bisect?
>
> Do we have a known good kernel? I looked back through the thread and
> didn't see any reports where the postgres test on ext4 passed in this
> config.
>
> -chris
>
Try a kernel before 5a87b7a5da250c9be6d757758425dfeaf8ed3179
from the tests I've done that one showed the least or no corruption if
you count the empty /etc/env.d/03opengl as an artefact
(I tested 3 commits in total)
1) 5a87b7a5da250c9be6d757758425dfeaf8ed3179
2) 1de3e3df917459422cb2aecac440febc8879d410
3) bd2d0210cf22f2bd0cef72eb97cf94fc7d31d8cc
1 -> 3 (earlier -> later)
Regards
Matt
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]