[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
- From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk mikefedyk com>
- To: Chris Mason <chris mason oracle com>
- Cc: Jon Nelson <jnelson jamponi net>, htejun <htejun gmail com>, Matt <jackdachef gmail com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso mit edu>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel vger kernel org>, dm-devel <dm-devel redhat com>, Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>, htd <htd fancy-poultry org>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4 vger kernel org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs vger kernel org>, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:58:40 -0800
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris mason oracle com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2010-12-09 18:16:16 -0500:
>> > 512MB.
>> >
>> > 'free' reports 75MB, 419MB free.
>> >
>> > I originally noticed the problem on really real hardware (thinkpad
>> > T61p), however.
>>
>> If you can easily reproduce it could you try a git bisect?
>
> Do we have a known good kernel? I looked back through the thread and
> didn't see any reports where the postgres test on ext4 passed in this
> config.
>
2.6.34.something. -- Any chance a newer kernel can be tested to be found good?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]