[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-mpath: Two minor fixes while processing activate_path
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Cc: "linux-scsi vger kernel org" <linux-scsi vger kernel org>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-mpath: Two minor fixes while processing activate_path
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:57:08 +0000
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0700, Moger, Babu wrote:
> - DMERR("Cannot failover device because scsi_dh_%s was not "
> - "loaded.", m->hw_handler_name);
> + DMERR("Could not failover device. Error %d.", errors);
Would it be meaningful still to include m->hw_handler_name in that message?
Alasdair
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]