[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita tomonori lab ntt co jp>
- To: hch lst de
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, snitzer redhat com, linux-scsi vger kernel org, fujita tomonori lab ntt co jp, linux-ide vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:04:30 -0000
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:24:13 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de> wrote:
> > Wired, I've just got Intel SSD X25-M drives and mkfs.xfs worked well.
>
> What codebase were you testing on? Sorry, but curently I'm a bit lost
> in the maze of patches. I've got both and intel and an OCZ SSD (right
> now I'm travelling with only access to the OCZ actually) and I'd like
> to test the latest variant again.
I tested:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git discard
I rebased the changes against Jens' for-2.6.36 and I've just sent the
latest patch.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]