[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita tomonori lab ntt co jp>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, linux-scsi vger kernel org, martin petersen oracle com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de, akpm linux-foundation org, hch lst de
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload
- Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:16:40 -0400
On Sun, Jun 27 2010 at 8:32am -0400,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita tomonori lab ntt co jp> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:07:12 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de> wrote:
>
> > > How about this?
> >
> > As I tried to explain before this utterly confuses the I/O completion
> > path. With the patch applied even a simple mkfs.xfs that issues discard
> > just hangs.
>
> Wired. I just tried mkfs.xfs against scsi_debug with my block patches
> (I saw one discard command). Seemed that it worked fine.
My leak fixes have been tested extensively against all permuations of
devices with discards (ATA trim, SCSI UNMAP, SCSI WRTIE SAME w/ unmap=1).
I think we need to get Christoph's discard payload transformation
complete by fixing the leaks _without_ trying to rework how discard
commands are tagged, etc. E.g. fix what Jens already has staged in
linux-2.6-block's 'for-next' and 'for-2.6.36'.
With that sorted out we can then look at longer term changes to cleanup
discard request processing.
Regards,
Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]