[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>
- To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita tomonori lab ntt co jp>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, martin petersen oracle com, snitzer redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de, linux-scsi vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, hch lst de
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload
- Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:33:35 +0200
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:32:07PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:07:12 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de> wrote:
>
> > > How about this?
> >
> > As I tried to explain before this utterly confuses the I/O completion
> > path. With the patch applied even a simple mkfs.xfs that issues discard
> > just hangs.
>
> Wired. I just tried mkfs.xfs against scsi_debug with my block patches
> (I saw one discard command). Seemed that it worked fine.
Doesn't work for me against either a real SSD or WRITE SAME support in
qemu. But I think I didn't actually have your barrier patches applied,
so I'll try again with a clean tree.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]