[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard requests
- From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita tomonori lab ntt co jp>
- To: snitzer redhat com
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, martin petersen oracle com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley suse de, akpm linux-foundation org, hch lst de
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard requests
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:33:34 +0900
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:56:51 -0400
Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com> wrote:
> Don't alloc discard bio with a biovec in blkdev_issue_discard. Doing so
> means bio_has_data() will not be true until the SCSI layer adds the
> payload to the discard request via blk_add_request_payload.
>
> bio_{enable,disable}_inline_vecs are not expected to be widely used so
> they were exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>
> This patch avoids the need for the following VM accounting fix for
> discards: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/23/361
Why do we need to avoid the above fix? Surely, the above fix is hacky
but much simpler than this patch.
> NOTE: Jens, you said you applied Tao Ma's fix but I cannot see it in
> your linux-2.6-block's for-next or for-2.6.36... as such I didn't revert
> it in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 2 ++
> block/blk-lib.c | 2 +-
> fs/bio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/bio.h | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]