[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: James Bottomley <James Bottomley suse de>
- Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe kernel dk>, dm-devel redhat com, Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi vger kernel org>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:23:09 -0400
On Wed, Jun 30 2010 at 1:01pm -0400,
James Bottomley <James Bottomley suse de> wrote:
> So this is more directly what I'm thinking. It gives us an exactly
> correct place to hang the discard allocation in SCSI. The next patch
> shows a potential implementation in sd.
>
> I think it should avoid all the leaks people have been seeing trying to
> move the discard allocation/free into scsi. I also think it should
> facilitate sending discard through SCSI as a REQ_TYPE_FS.
Thanks james!
I'll look to take this template and layer in Christoph's approach to
pushing the page allocation down into SCSI.
I'll also look at Tomo's REQ_TYPE_FS changes for discard.
I'll report back as soon as I have something.
Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]