[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe kernel dk>
- To: James Bottomley <James Bottomley suse de>
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com, Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi vger kernel org>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:51:14 +0200
On 30/06/10 19.01, James Bottomley wrote:
> So this is more directly what I'm thinking. It gives us an exactly
> correct place to hang the discard allocation in SCSI. The next patch
> shows a potential implementation in sd.
>
> I think it should avoid all the leaks people have been seeing trying to
> move the discard allocation/free into scsi. I also think it should
> facilitate sending discard through SCSI as a REQ_TYPE_FS.
This is so much better than the other hacks, thanks for doing this.
--
Jens Axboe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]