[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>
- To: Jens Axboe <axboe kernel dk>
- Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi vger kernel org>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, dm-devel redhat com, James Bottomley <James Bottomley suse de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch lst de>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:54:46 -0400
>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <axboe kernel dk> writes:
Jens> On 30/06/10 19.01, James Bottomley wrote:
>> So this is more directly what I'm thinking. It gives us an exactly
>> correct place to hang the discard allocation in SCSI. The next patch
>> shows a potential implementation in sd.
>>
>> I think it should avoid all the leaks people have been seeing trying
>> to move the discard allocation/free into scsi. I also think it
>> should facilitate sending discard through SCSI as a REQ_TYPE_FS.
Jens> This is so much better than the other hacks, thanks for doing
Jens> this.
Agreed!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]