[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>
- Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>, Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth suse de>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura ce jp nec com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 09:18:56 -0400
On Tue, May 11 2010 at 2:55am -0400,
Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 10 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > blk_init_queue() allocates the request_queue structure and then
> > initializes it as needed (request_fn, elevator, etc).
> >
> > Split initialization out to blk_init_allocated_queue_node.
> > Introduce blk_init_allocated_queue wrapper function to model existing
> > blk_init_queue and blk_init_queue_node interfaces.
> >
> > Export elv_register_queue to allow a newly added elevator to be
> > registered with sysfs. Export elv_unregister_queue for symmetry.
> >
> > These changes allow DM to initialize a device's request_queue with more
> > precision. In particular, DM no longer unconditionally initializes a
> > full request_queue (elevator et al). It only does so for a
> > request-based DM device.
>
> Looks good, I'll apply this. I don't think the exports need to be _GPL
> in this case, generally I've only done that with the exports for hooking
> in a new IO scheduler.
OK, thanks for picking this up. Do you want me to send v2 that drops
the _GPL or will you make those changes?
Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]