[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs
- From: Eric Dumazet <eric dumazet gmail com>
- To: Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>
- Cc: herbert gondor hengli com au, dm-devel redhat com, ak linux intel com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, agk redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:52:08 +0200
Le lundi 31 mai 2010 à 19:46 +0200, Andi Kleen a écrit :
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Yes seems like I'm behind on per cpu innovations.
>
> > Since commit e0fdb0e050eae331, we have a __percpu annotation so that
> > sparse can be augmented. This would also make the comment unnecessary...
>
> I think the comment is still necessary.
>
> >
> > > + __get_cpu_var(io_wq_cpu) = current;
> >
> > this_cpu_write(io_wq_cpu, current)
>
> And this one looks more ugly than before and does not seem
> to generate better code, so I decided to skip it.
This is because you whould use __this_cpu_write() in this context of
course ;)
generated code : one instruction
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]