[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: reorganize claim/release implementation
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: axboe kernel dk, hch infradead org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, petero2 telia com, schwidefsky de ibm com, heiko carstens de ibm com, jack suse cz, akpm linux-foundation org, adilger kernel dilger ca, tytso mit edu, mfasheh suse com, joel becker oracle com, aelder sgi com, dm-devel redhat com, drbd-dev lists linbit com, neilb suse de, leochen broadcom com, sbranden broadcom com, chris mason oracle com, swhiteho redhat com, shaggy linux vnet ibm com, joern logfs org, konishi ryusuke lab ntt co jp, reiserfs-devel vger kernel org, viro zeniv linux org uk
- Cc: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: reorganize claim/release implementation
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 17:15:29 +0100
With claim/release rolled into blkdev_get/put(), there's no reason to
keep bd_abort/finish_claim(), __bd_claim() and bd_release() as
separate functions. It only makes the code difficult to follow.
Collapse them into blkdev_get/put(). This will ease future changes
around claim/release.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index fc48912..269bfbb 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -772,79 +772,6 @@ static struct block_device *bd_start_claiming(struct block_device *bdev,
}
}
-/* releases bdev_lock */
-static void __bd_abort_claiming(struct block_device *whole, void *holder)
-{
- BUG_ON(whole->bd_claiming != holder);
- whole->bd_claiming = NULL;
- wake_up_bit(&whole->bd_claiming, 0);
-
- spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
- bdput(whole);
-}
-
-/**
- * bd_abort_claiming - abort claiming a block device
- * @whole: whole block device returned by bd_start_claiming()
- * @holder: holder trying to claim @bdev
- *
- * Abort a claiming block started by bd_start_claiming(). Note that
- * @whole is not the block device to be claimed but the whole device
- * returned by bd_start_claiming().
- *
- * CONTEXT:
- * Grabs and releases bdev_lock.
- */
-static void bd_abort_claiming(struct block_device *whole, void *holder)
-{
- spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
- __bd_abort_claiming(whole, holder); /* releases bdev_lock */
-}
-
-/* increment holders when we have a legitimate claim. requires bdev_lock */
-static void __bd_claim(struct block_device *bdev, struct block_device *whole,
- void *holder)
-{
- /* note that for a whole device bd_holders
- * will be incremented twice, and bd_holder will
- * be set to bd_may_claim before being set to holder
- */
- whole->bd_holders++;
- whole->bd_holder = bd_may_claim;
- bdev->bd_holders++;
- bdev->bd_holder = holder;
-}
-
-/**
- * bd_finish_claiming - finish claiming a block device
- * @bdev: block device of interest (passed to bd_start_claiming())
- * @whole: whole block device returned by bd_start_claiming()
- * @holder: holder trying to claim @bdev
- *
- * Finish a claiming block started by bd_start_claiming().
- *
- * CONTEXT:
- * Grabs and releases bdev_lock.
- */
-static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev,
- struct block_device *whole, void *holder)
-{
- spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
- BUG_ON(!bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder));
- __bd_claim(bdev, whole, holder);
- __bd_abort_claiming(whole, holder); /* not actually an abort */
-}
-
-static void bd_release(struct block_device *bdev)
-{
- spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
- if (!--bdev->bd_contains->bd_holders)
- bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder = NULL;
- if (!--bdev->bd_holders)
- bdev->bd_holder = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
static int add_symlink(struct kobject *from, struct kobject *to)
{
@@ -1223,10 +1150,30 @@ int blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, void *holder)
res = __blkdev_get(bdev, mode, 0);
if (whole) {
- if (res == 0)
- bd_finish_claiming(bdev, whole, holder);
- else
- bd_abort_claiming(whole, holder);
+ /* finish claiming */
+ spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
+
+ if (res == 0) {
+ BUG_ON(!bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder));
+ /*
+ * Note that for a whole device bd_holders
+ * will be incremented twice, and bd_holder
+ * will be set to bd_may_claim before being
+ * set to holder
+ */
+ whole->bd_holders++;
+ whole->bd_holder = bd_may_claim;
+ bdev->bd_holders++;
+ bdev->bd_holder = holder;
+ }
+
+ /* tell others that we're done */
+ BUG_ON(whole->bd_claiming != holder);
+ whole->bd_claiming = NULL;
+ wake_up_bit(&whole->bd_claiming, 0);
+
+ spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
+ bdput(whole);
}
return res;
@@ -1272,6 +1219,7 @@ static int __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part)
bdev->bd_part_count--;
if (!--bdev->bd_openers) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bdev->bd_holders);
sync_blockdev(bdev);
kill_bdev(bdev);
}
@@ -1303,10 +1251,31 @@ static int __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part)
int blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
{
if (mode & FMODE_EXCL) {
+ bool bdev_free;
+
+ /*
+ * Release a claim on the device. The holder fields
+ * are protected with bdev_lock. bd_mutex is to
+ * synchronize disk_holder unlinking.
+ */
mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
- bd_release(bdev);
- if (!bdev->bd_holders)
+ spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(--bdev->bd_holders < 0);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(--bdev->bd_contains->bd_holders < 0);
+
+ /* bd_contains might point to self, check in a separate step */
+ if ((bdev_free = !bdev->bd_holders))
+ bdev->bd_holder = NULL;
+ if (!bdev->bd_contains->bd_holders)
+ bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder = NULL;
+
+ spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
+
+ /* if this was the last claim, holder link should go too */
+ if (bdev_free)
bd_unlink_disk_holder(bdev);
+
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
}
return __blkdev_put(bdev, mode, 0);
--
1.7.1
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]