[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] dm mpath: delay retry activate_path on SCSI_DH_RETRY
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: sekharan linux vnet ibm com, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth suse de>, Mike Christie <mchristi redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] dm mpath: delay retry activate_path on SCSI_DH_RETRY
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:32:17 -0400
On Tue, Jun 09 2009 at 4:54pm -0400,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com> wrote:
> No functional change.
>
> Repost with changes made to apply cleanly on top of the patch
> (http://marc.info/?l=dm-devel&m=124424663327710&w=2) that changed
> dm-mpath.c
>
> -----------------
> From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com>
>
> SCSI Device Handlers return SCSI_DH_IMM_RETRY if we could retry
> immediately and SCSI_DH_RETRY in cases where it is better to retry
> after some delay.
>
> Currently we retry immediately irrespective of SCSI_DH_IMM_RETRY and
> SCSI_DH_RETRY. This patch adds a user configurable attribute
> pg_init_delay_secs which specifies the number of seconds to delay
> before retrying scsi_dh_activate, when it returned SCSI_DH_RETRY.
>
> Default for this attribute is set to 2 seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth suse de>
> Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com>
I'm auditing dm-devel's patchwork and would just like to confirm that
others would still like to see this go in?
Patch in question is captured here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/29088/
Mike C.,
An earlier version of this patch got your "Looks ok.":
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/23946/
Can I translate that to your "Acked-by:" if/when I rebase and repost?
Please advise,
Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]