[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/5] mtd: fix bdev exclusive open bugs in block2mtd::add_device()
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1 gmail com>
- To: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Cc: jack suse cz, leochen broadcom com, heiko carstens de ibm com, dm-devel redhat com, adilger kernel dilger ca, konishi ryusuke lab ntt co jp, shaggy linux vnet ibm com, drbd-dev lists linbit com, joel becker oracle com, hch infradead org, aelder sgi com, mfasheh suse com, joern logfs org, reiserfs-devel vger kernel org, viro zeniv linux org uk, swhiteho redhat com, chris mason oracle com, axboe kernel dk, tytso mit edu, sbranden broadcom com, petero2 telia com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, schwidefsky de ibm com, linux-mtd lists infradead org, akpm linux-foundation org
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/5] mtd: fix bdev exclusive open bugs in block2mtd::add_device()
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:11:12 -0000
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 11:42 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmmm... not really. The patch is small enough and splitting it won't
> really buy as any better bisectability. Splitting patches into
> logical changes is a good thing but it's no religious dogma. Let's
> apply it to the point it actually helps.
Well, it is more about if your second fix is buggy, we could revert it
without reverting the first fix. But anyway, this is not a big deal, so
let's forget about this indeed.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]