[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
- From: Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>
- To: Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Cc: Mike Snitzer <msnitzer redhat com>, Andi Kleen <ak linux intel com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>, pedrib gmail com, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:06:08 +0200
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:34:50PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 03:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely
> > to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups.
>
> Shrug. The main encryption thread and ESSIV per-cpu are two separate
> things from my point of view.
Is not obvious to me.
>
> Anyway, the ball is on DM maintainer's playground now.
Well I was told already for 2.6.35 it was ready to merge
(and also I already have an active user base, people are using
it because it's solving a wide spread problem)
I am frankly somewhat surprised things should be suddenly
completely open now again and such contortions as you
did to the patch should be needed.
-Andi
--
ak linux intel com -- Speaking for myself only.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]