[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
- From: Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>
- To: Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>, Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, Andi Kleen <ak linux intel com>, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, pedrib gmail com, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:44:54 +0200
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:01:51PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:22:57PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > this out quite yet. You have 4 patches yet you say conceptually there
> > are 2 distinct changes.
>
> IOW should we end up with 2 bisectable patches here?
>
> And the potentially-broken/poorly-performing stacked async should be
> explained in comments inline perhaps if we're choosing to ignore this
> apparent regression.
It's not broken AFAIK and it will not perform worse than the original
single thread work queue.
-Andi
--
ak linux intel com -- Speaking for myself only.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]