[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>
- Cc: Andi Kleen <ak linux intel com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, pedrib gmail com, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:48:27 +0100
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 07:17:36PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> AFAIK Nested dm-crypt is not extreme for some folk who have routine
> configurations using it. But if in_interrupt is set how does this code
> work for them now compared to how it worked before?
And indeed, even if in_interrupt is not set, is there any performance
impact for this (minority) class of users?
Alasdair
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]