[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] block: eliminate potential for infinite loop in blkdev_issue_discard
- From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe fusionio com>
- To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- Cc: "dm-devel redhat com" <dm-devel redhat com>, "linux-scsi vger kernel org" <linux-scsi vger kernel org>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] block: eliminate potential for infinite loop in blkdev_issue_discard
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:05:48 +0200
On 2010-10-14 23:37, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27 2010 at 2:13pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com> wrote:
>
>> Due to the recently identified overflow in read_capacity_16() it was
>> possible for max_discard_sectors to be zero but still have discards
>> enabled on the associated device's queue.
>>
>> Eliminate the possibility for blkdev_issue_discard to infinitely loop.
>>
>> Interestingly this issue wasn't identified until a device, whose
>> discard_granularity was 0 due to read_capacity_16 overflow, was consumed
>> by blk_stack_limits() to construct limits for a higher-level DM
>> multipath device. The multipath device's resulting limits never had the
>> discard limits stacked because blk_stack_limits() will only do so if
>> the bottom device's discard_granularity != 0. This resulted in the
>> multipath device's limits.max_discard_sectors being 0.
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> This patch would only serve as a future safety-net now that the
> elimination of the overflow in read_capacity_16() has been staged for
> 2.6.37. Defensive programming and all...
>
> What do you (and others) think about this patch?
Agree, may as well play it safe(r).
--
Jens Axboe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]