[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Fwd: [dm-crypt] [BUG] bad performance and system stalls when using dm-crypt
- From: dave b <db pub mail gmail com>
- To: Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel vger kernel org>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Fwd: [dm-crypt] [BUG] bad performance and system stalls when using dm-crypt
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:52:41 +1100
On 25 October 2010 03:31, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com> wrote:
> On 10/24/2010 05:32 PM, dave b wrote:
>> I am forwarding this to the linux kernel mailing list to see if anyone
>> is actually interested with this bug or not. I suspect that the patch
>> to allow DM-CRYPT to use multiple cpus(Scale to multiple CPUs) will
>> remove most of the problem but *not* all of it. As I previously was
>> triggering the bug on a single core system.
>
> Hi,
> sorry for not updating the bug. We know about this.
>
> Fix was expected to be based on top of the Andi's dm-crypt per-cpu
> patch but unfortunately I found serious problems there
> (see this thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/20/215 )
>
> So there are now several known situations when dm-crypt doesn't
> perform as expected (another problem just appeared when using CFQ,
> (because dm(-crypt) lost the issuing process reference)
> see http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/24/59).
Thank for you replying ^ ^
I was aware with the problems and I am following Andi's dm-crypt
per-cpu patch (I haven't applied or tested it). However, I didn't know
about http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/24/59 -->
So this may well be the root of the problem!
Also, won't http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/24/59 need to be altered
(again) to work with Andi's patch ?
--
There's small choice in rotten apples. -- William Shakespeare, "The
Taming of the Shrew"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]