[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] idr_get_new_exact ?
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun gmail com>
- To: Roland Dreier <rdreier cisco com>
- Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad wizery com>, akpm linux-foundation org, Steve Wise <swise chelsio com>, linux-ppp vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-raid vger kernel org, linux-rdma vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, Paul Mackerras <paulus samba org>, linux-i2c vger kernel org, "Ben Dooks \(embedded platforms\)" <ben-linux fluff org>, netdev vger kernel org, "Jean Delvare \(PC drivers, core\)" <khali linux-fr org>, Sean Hefty <sean hefty intel com>, Roland Dreier <rolandd cisco com>, Hal Rosenstock <hal rosenstock gmail com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] idr_get_new_exact ?
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:26:47 +0200
Hello,
On 09/20/2010 10:35 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Looks fine to me as an improvement over the status quo, but I wonder how
> many of these places could use the radix_tree stuff instead? If you're
> not using the ability of the idr code to assign an id for you, then it
> seems the radix_tree API is a better fit.
I agree. Wouldn't those users better off simply using radix tree?
Thanks.
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]